Compare a purchase on your terms
Compare suppliers by cost, support and flexibility. Enter your own options, scores and evidence to see what the tradeoffs depend on.
This example runs in your browser without AI. You can also copy a starter to continue in ChatGPT.
A working local example. Your changes stay in this page until you choose to save, copy or download. No AI model is called.
Simple starter leads on your entries
Simple starter has the highest weighted score among the included options marked as meeting your must-haves. Check the evidence before deciding.
What matters
- Lower ongoing cost
Priority (0-10): 5
- Useful support
Priority (0-10): 4
- Flexibility to change
Priority (0-10): 3
Options and evidence
- Simple starter
Weighted score: 6.83 / 10. Lower ongoing cost: 9/10; Useful support: 4/10; Flexibility to change: 7/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
- Flexible monthly
Weighted score: 6.75 / 10. Lower ongoing cost: 6/10; Useful support: 6/10; Flexibility to change: 9/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
- Supported package
Weighted score: 6.33 / 10. Lower ongoing cost: 5/10; Useful support: 9/10; Flexibility to change: 5/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
Check what could change the choice
- Verify the dealbreakers and the evidence behind the scores that matter most. Note any unresolved fact, then revisit the comparison before deciding.
The starting values are examples, not verified facts about your situation. Replace them with your own inputs and keep unverified assumptions visible. Multiply each score by its priority, add the results, then divide by the total priority. Weighted scores summarize your priorities and judgments. They do not verify evidence or make an objective recommendation.
Work with KevinFor the moments like this.
Three suppliers could meet a small business need, and each emphasizes a different advantage. The cheapest looks attractive, but you may need support or the ability to change plans. Use invented options to explore how priorities alter a comparison before collecting real quotes and checking the terms that matter.
What becomes possible
Edit supplier names, criteria, priorities and scores. Record the evidence behind your judgments and mark which options meet your must-haves. The starting suppliers and scores are illustrative.
Put this to work.
Use the starter in ChatGPT or work with Kevin on your own situation.
Try it in ChatGPT
Copy the starter, open ChatGPT and paste it into a conversation. Add only the details you want to share. Nothing is sent automatically.
Review the starter for ChatGPT
ChatGPT access and features depend on your account. Keep private details out until you understand the settings of the service you use.
Choose how you want help.
Get guidance while you do the work, or ask Kevin to scope and deliver an agreed result.
Guidance and finished work are priced separately. You and Kevin agree the scope and price before work begins.
Sources, capability notes and how this example works
This local experience uses authored sample content and deterministic controls. Changing an input updates the example; no model runs, outside records are checked, or real-world actions are performed. Use the sources for the underlying AI capabilities and audience context, and the human check above when you apply the idea.
ChatGPT capabilities overview ↗Current drafting, document, visual, and explanation capabilities; these local examples do not call ChatGPT. Accessed September 11, 2026.
Research checked September 11, 2026. Access to specific AI features depends on your account, plan and region. Sample amounts, timings, scores and feedback illustrate the method rather than claim measured outcomes.