See the work around the workshop
See the work around a workshop. Enter preparation and review estimates, compare quantities and include one-time setup.
This example runs in your browser without AI. You can also copy a starter to continue in ChatGPT.
A working local example. Your changes stay in this page until you choose to save, copy or download. No AI model is called.
The after estimate is lower
The after total is 44 min lower, including setup. Check the assumptions against a real cycle.
- Workshop sessions to prepare
- 4
- Before total
- 228 min
- After total, including setup
- 184 min
- One-time setup
- 0 min
- Before minus after
- 44 min
Included items
- Organize the opening
12 min before and 8 min after per repetition.
- Prepare question branches
15 min before and 10 min after per repetition.
- Check examples and sources
10 min before and 10 min after per repetition.
- Rehearse and revise
20 min before and 18 min after per repetition.
Assumptions for this estimate
- No assumptions recorded yet.
Measure one cycle
- Measure one actual repetition, including preparation and review. Check setup separately, then update the estimates before making a commitment.
The starting values are examples, not verified facts about your situation. Replace them with your own inputs and keep unverified assumptions visible. Before total = sum of included before amounts x quantity. After total = sum of included after amounts x quantity + one-time setup. Before minus after: a positive value means a lower after estimate; a negative value means a higher one. These totals show what your inputs imply. They are not measured savings and do not account for work or costs you leave out.
Work with KevinFor the moments like this.
A tool may make an outline faster without reducing the work of checking examples or rehearsing delivery. You want to see the whole preparation task before judging value.
What becomes possible
Edit the preparation steps and their before-and-after times, choose the number of sessions and add setup once. Keep checking and rehearsal in both scenarios; the sample timings are unmeasured starting assumptions.
Put this to work.
Use the starter in ChatGPT or work with Kevin on your own situation.
Try it in ChatGPT
Copy the starter, open ChatGPT and paste it into a conversation. Add only the details you want to share. Nothing is sent automatically.
Review the starter for ChatGPT
ChatGPT access and features depend on your account. Keep private details out until you understand the settings of the service you use.
Choose how you want help.
Get guidance while you do the work, or ask Kevin to scope and deliver an agreed result.
Guidance and finished work are priced separately. You and Kevin agree the scope and price before work begins.
Sources, capability notes and how this example works
This local experience uses authored sample content and deterministic controls. Changing an input updates the example; no model runs, outside records are checked, or real-world actions are performed. Use the sources for the underlying AI capabilities and audience context, and the human check above when you apply the idea.
Gallup: Teachers' reported AI use ↗June 24, 2025. Survey of 2,232 U.S. public K-12 teachers; reported use and savings are not causal evidence.
OpenAI: How educators can get started with ChatGPT ↗Checked September 11, 2026. Suggested preparation techniques requiring educator review.
Research checked September 11, 2026. Access to specific AI features depends on your account, plan and region. Sample amounts, timings, scores and feedback illustrate the method rather than claim measured outcomes.