Protect the scope kindly
Compare responses to added work. Edit the options and judgments, weigh timing, scope and flexibility, and keep non-negotiable requirements visible.
This example runs in your browser without AI. You can also copy a starter to continue in ChatGPT.
A working local example. Your changes stay in this page until you choose to save, copy or download. No AI model is called.
Replace an agreed item leads on your entries
Replace an agreed item has the highest weighted score among the included options marked as meeting your must-haves. Check the evidence before deciding.
What matters
- Preserve the current deadline
Priority (0-10): 6
- Include the new request
Priority (0-10): 5
- Keep future flexibility
Priority (0-10): 4
Options and evidence
- Replace an agreed item
Weighted score: 6.47 / 10. Preserve the current deadline: 7/10; Include the new request: 7/10; Keep future flexibility: 5/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
- Finish the original scope first
Weighted score: 6.4 / 10. Preserve the current deadline: 9/10; Include the new request: 2/10; Keep future flexibility: 8/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
- Extend the project by agreement
Weighted score: 6.07 / 10. Preserve the current deadline: 3/10; Include the new request: 9/10; Keep future flexibility: 7/10. Evidence and open questions: No evidence recorded yet.
Check what could change the choice
- Verify the dealbreakers and the evidence behind the scores that matter most. Note any unresolved fact, then revisit the comparison before deciding.
The starting values are examples, not verified facts about your situation. Replace them with your own inputs and keep unverified assumptions visible. Multiply each score by its priority, add the results, then divide by the total priority. Weighted scores summarize your priorities and judgments. They do not verify evidence or make an objective recommendation.
Work with KevinFor the moments like this.
A client requests an additional feature halfway through a small project. You want to preserve the relationship and still deliver the work already agreed. There may be room to substitute, extend, or defer the addition. Compare fictional approaches and notice which questions must be answered before any change becomes a commitment.
What becomes possible
Use the sample responses or name your own. Edit the criteria, priorities and scores, note the evidence and mark which options meet your must-haves before discussing a changed agreement.
Put this to work.
Use the starter in ChatGPT or work with Kevin on your own situation.
Try it in ChatGPT
Copy the starter, open ChatGPT and paste it into a conversation. Add only the details you want to share. Nothing is sent automatically.
Review the starter for ChatGPT
ChatGPT access and features depend on your account. Keep private details out until you understand the settings of the service you use.
Choose how you want help.
Get guidance while you do the work, or ask Kevin to scope and deliver an agreed result.
Guidance and finished work are priced separately. You and Kevin agree the scope and price before work begins.
Sources, capability notes and how this example works
This local experience uses authored sample content and deterministic controls. Changing an input updates the example; no model runs, outside records are checked, or real-world actions are performed. Use the sources for the underlying AI capabilities and audience context, and the human check above when you apply the idea.
ChatGPT capabilities overview ↗Current drafting, analysis, and explanation capabilities; local examples are authored. Accessed September 11, 2026.
Research checked September 11, 2026. Access to specific AI features depends on your account, plan and region. Sample amounts, timings, scores and feedback illustrate the method rather than claim measured outcomes.