Give your advice solid evidence
Match fictional recommendation claims to dated evidence. Separate an unknown from a contradiction before presenting a conclusion.
This example runs in your browser without AI. You can also copy a starter to continue in ChatGPT.
A working local example. Your changes stay in this page until you choose to save, copy or download. No AI model is called.
Separate claims from evidence
Fictional supplier notes: a current plan sheet lists monthly cancellation and CSV export. A help article says offline mode is unavailable. Team permissions have not been checked. Classify what the displayed sample supports, then inspect the explanation.
- Checked
- 0 of 3
- Matches the sample
- 0 of 3
Use the sample evidence: supported means it backs the claim; uncertain means it does not settle the claim; contradicted means it conflicts with the claim. These are fictional examples.
For the moments like this.
You are preparing a comparison for a client, and a confident draft includes features that may have changed. A marketing page, a dated help article, and an unconfirmed assumption do not carry the same weight. Examine a fictional research record and decide what can be stated, questioned, or removed before delivery.
What becomes possible
Check three fictional product claims against the supplied notes. Separate what the record supports, what it contradicts and what still needs a source before delivery.
Put this to work.
Use the starter in ChatGPT or work with Kevin on your own situation.
Try it in ChatGPT
Copy the starter, open ChatGPT and paste it into a conversation. Add only the details you want to share. Nothing is sent automatically.
Review the starter for ChatGPT
ChatGPT access and features depend on your account. Keep private details out until you understand the settings of the service you use.
Choose how you want help.
Get guidance while you do the work, or ask Kevin to scope and deliver an agreed result.
Guidance and finished work are priced separately. You and Kevin agree the scope and price before work begins.
Sources, capability notes and how this example works
This local experience uses authored sample content and deterministic controls. Changing an input updates the example; no model runs, outside records are checked, or real-world actions are performed. Use the sources for the underlying AI capabilities and audience context, and the human check above when you apply the idea.
MBO 2025 AI report ↗Self-reported independent-worker use; the public AI summary has limited sampling detail. Accessed September 11, 2026.
Searching the web with ChatGPT ↗Current search capability, not a guarantee that a generated claim is supported. Accessed September 11, 2026.
Research checked September 11, 2026. Access to specific AI features depends on your account, plan and region. Sample amounts, timings, scores and feedback illustrate the method rather than claim measured outcomes.